Obama wants side deals out of bill

Barack Obama, Marcelas Owens AP – Marcelas Owens of Seattle, whose mother, Tiffany Owens died after losing her job and health care, lower …

President Barack Obama is pushing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go further than Obama has previously disclosed to strip the final health care reform bill of the narrow deals aimed at appeasing specific senators.

The president wants to eliminate more than just Sen. Ben Nelson’s “Cornhusker Kickback” and Sen. Bill Nelson’s agreement to shield 800,000 Florida seniors from Medicare Advantage cuts, the White House told POLITICO Wednesday in response to questions about other deals in the bill.

Obama has asked Reid to strike provisions requested by senators from at least five other states, in an unusual move that accentuates the culture clash between the president’s rhetoric on changing the ways of Washington and the Senate leader’s needs to exercise the old-fashioned tools of Congress to pass laws.

“We’ve removed many of the special provisions that initially found their way into the legislation, and we’ve made it clear to the Senate that the president’s position is that the final bill shouldn’t include any earmarks or provisions that would favor a single state or district over the rest of the country,” White House spokesman Reid Cherlin said in a statement Wednesday.

Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the decision on what to keep in the bill rests with congressional leaders and that no determinations have been made.

Senators whose deals have been targeted — some of whom did not know the deals might be in danger — said they would fight to maintain them, arguing they are in no way as egregious as the Cornhusker Kickback.

“We have defended it, and we will defend it,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whose state picked up $600 million in extra Medicaid funding for having already expanded its coverage of low-income individuals.

But ever since last-minute deal making helped sour voters on the Senate bill that passed on Christmas Eve, any provision identified by Republicans or the media as benefiting a single state or a small number of states has sat on shaky ground.

Obama tried to publicly distance himself from the deals, saying he wasn’t in the room when they were struck, even though some of his aides were. The president rankled Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi by criticizing them for doing what generations of their predecessors have done: cut deals. And in the process, he may have made it entirely untenable for them to deploy one of the tried-and-true methods for muscling major reforms through Congress.

“Legislators need pork to make things happen,” Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University professor of history and public affairs, wrote in POLITICO Wednesday. “It is unrealistic to expect that legislative leaders won’t use one of the few tools at their disposal to get things done.”

Zelizer noted that then-Senate Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson promised the construction of a federal dam in exchange for votes for the Civil Rights Act of 1957 from a group of Western Democrats

In a letter to congressional leaders last week, Obama targeted the Nebraska and Florida deals for elimination. (The Florida provision could also shield some seniors in California, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, according Sen. Bill Nelson's office.) But in response to questions from POLITICO, the White House detailed other provisions that the president wants to see removed.

The so-called Louisiana Purchase is still safe, according to the White House, since the provision requested by Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) would apply to any state in which all the counties have been declared a disaster zone. The Medicaid funding formula fix is worth $300 million to Louisiana, according to Landrieu.

But Obama has asked Reid to strike a provision that would send $1.1 billion in extra Medicaid funding to Massachusetts and Vermont — states that have already expanded Medicaid coverage but would otherwise not be reimbursed at the same level as states that would boost their Medicaid populations for the first time under the bill’s mandate.

“What I told Harry Reid is that Vermont does the right thing, and I don’t want Vermont to be penalized for doing the right thing,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said in a statement.

Through a spokeswoman, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said he, too, was working with the president “to make sure Massachusetts’s past investment to expand health coverage to low-income individuals is recognized in health reform.”

The president is also asking Reid to “look at removing” a $100 million hospital grant program requested by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who has acknowledged that the University of Connecticut would qualify for the money.

But the senator’s aides added that university teaching hospitals in a dozen states would also qualify and that the program is not an earmark, since the money would be awarded on a competitive basis through the Department of Health and Human Services.

Another provision the president has asked Reid to consider removing was promoted by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) on behalf of residents of Libby, Mont.

The bill includes language that would allow people who have been exposed to asbestos from a vermiculite mine in the town to receive Medicare assistance, although a Baucus aide said the language would apply to victims of any government-declared public health emergency. The language would fulfill the government’s responsibility, first codified in a 1980 law, to provide health care to victims of public health emergencies, the aide said.

Libby was the first town to receive the emergency declaration, and implementing language is needed to finish the process, the aide said.

“The Senate bill meets the responsibility that was established in 1980, so I can’t understand why anyone would want to make it impossible to meet our statutory obligation to address disasters of this magnitude, where more than 290 people have died from asbestos-related disease,” Baucus said in a statement. “This type of tragedy could happen to any town, anywhere across the country, and all Americans deserve to have this protection.”

The aide added: “The public health emergency provision is not a special deal.”

Read More Stories from POLITICO
Obama's pitch: Fate of presidency on the line
GOP plots Senate health roadblock
Biden anchors Radio & TV dinner
CBO releases health bill estimates
Dems' love-hate game with Wall St.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Related Searches:

More...

356 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Jack Thu Mar 11, 2010 03:14 pm PST Report Abuse
    Any Senator that adds provisions to the health care bill is not worthy of office. They are guilty of padding their state's pockets, taking advantage of the rest of us and doing what legally amounts to kickbacks and/or selling their vote. I am sickened by their brashness as if they or their state deserves better than the rest of us. What a shame that we have come to electing these corrupt and conniving officials. Why don’t we all start inviting these greedy, dishonest elected officials over for dinner and show them how real American’s live, working to make the mortgage, and put food on the table for our families!
  • 1 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Victor Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:58 am PST Report Abuse
    Congressman

    I am a 84 year old Republican and a Veteran of 20 years. I am not offtrack like most of the other Republicans who were voted in by the people, but do not support the people. They are paid off by the millionaire Lobbyists, Drug Companies, Insurance Companeis, etc.; DO NOT use their own minds as to what is Right or Wrong, and they even Brainwash the people into believing that President Obama*s Gov*t controlled plan is No Good. Then the Republicans make the riciculous alibi that it will cost too much and they don*t mention the fact that they run us into Trillion Dollars in the past by spending. We can find ways to pay for the Gov*t Health Care Option. Congressman without using their own mind should not have been elected into office. They are supporting Lobbyists and Not the People.

    Then the Repulblicans make the ridiculous alibi that it will cost too much. We can find ways to pay for the cost. Money has to be spent to make good changes.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Dr Cj Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:16 am PST Report Abuse
    obama ONLY wants these measures out because they are UNCONSTITUTIONAL
    and of course he knows that ... being a constituional scholar
    he knows that the bill will be defeated in the supreme court when the insurance companies sue the government
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    baconservative Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:14 am PST Report Abuse
    But everyone wants the entire bill sacked. Start new and get the low lying fruit. You'd get bipartisan support and lots of Senate votes. It'd even be ethical and no need illegal moves. And some folks actually thought Obama was smart.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    happypup Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:13 am PST Report Abuse
    WOW! so many backward thinking people here. No bill is going to be perfect and not government is going to be perfect either. But something has to be done. There is just no pleasing the conservatives on anything now a days except war and national defense. It seems all the Republicans and Conservatives just want to focus their hate and anger on fighting wars with other countries they perceive as the "enemy." To hell with everything else, the infrastructure, the environment, corporate regulation, social services. You know a good chunk of the national debt is due to military spending and fighting wars, but no Conservatives care about that. And how are we supposed to pay for our wars? Where is the money supposed to come from? Thin Air? We just print more? As long as there aren't any taxes. Right?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Patti Thu Mar 11, 2010 08:51 am PST Report Abuse
    The comparison of LB Johnson promising to build a dam for a vote regarding Civil Rights is totally different than what's happening in Washington now with the Health Reform Bill. The dam and the Civil Rights movement was like comparing apples and oranges, but the deals that are being promised now are exempting people from having to comply with the actual bill itself. If Health Reform is not good for all the states, then it's not good for any of them...and that includes congress members, too. They should have to have the same insurance as the rest of the country. If they vote it in for us, they should have it, too!
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    Larry Thu Mar 11, 2010 06:50 am PST Report Abuse
    The APOLCALYPSE IS COMING! This is just the beginning, because it wont stop with a so called health care bill. Already their is talk of using a card to identify ,buy,work,etc. Can we say mark of the BEAST?Certainly not! I must be sadly mistaken.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Pat Thu Mar 11, 2010 06:21 am PST Report Abuse
    Draft a bill that only deals with health care reform, no pork. Post it on the internet for all to read. Discuss it on c-span. And cut it down, there's no reason for a bill to be over 2k pages. No wonder no one wants to read it and actually know what they're voting for. And for those with no internet access or cable, highlight the terms in around 5 pages and mail to those citizens. How about the transparency we were promised? And since our representatives do not know the meaning of the word "representative", either give them a dictionary or put the health care on the ballot for the voters to decide.
  • 1 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    C Thu Mar 11, 2010 05:47 am PST Report Abuse
    Another birther nutbag. By your definition, none of our first 10 - 12 presidents was a natural born citizen either.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    House R Thu Mar 11, 2010 04:56 am PST Report Abuse
    Free Milk and Cheese! Turn your cell phone off to get some!

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.